Seattle City Council movements to update surveillance regulation

The City of Seattle has long debated if surveillance era is a public protection device or a threat to privateness. The Seattle City Council is trying to balance those competing viewpoints because it revises the metropolis’s surveillance ordinance.

vid16-policesurveillance-thumbnail-v03_copy.jpg (2060×1155)

The council not most effective want to be able to approve new and existing surveillance generation used by city corporations, it additionally desires to sign off on what real “records” is amassed as properly.

“As I stroll via the city, I see increasingly attached to light poles that I don’t know what they’re,” said Councilmember Mike O’Brien at a committee listening to on Wednesday.

Seattle police have accumulated a significant stock of surveillance tools over time, like these cameras alongside the waterfront in West Seattle.

The branch is presently now not using the cameras. Nor is it the use of the arguable computer software program SPD bought to reveal social media. It additionally dumped the drones received a federal grant in 2012. All of them met with public outcry.

Now all of the branch’s surveillance technology, new and vintage, ought to soon be underneath review, along side the information it collects.

“It gives the metropolis council an opportunity to vet how the records this is being obtained,” stated Shankar Narayan, technology director on the A.C.L.U. Of Washington.

Seattle Police Chief Operations Officer Brian Maxey instructed the council the branch changed into wary of adding some other layer of oversight to their investigative manner.

“We’re on board with commencing up the era and explaining the why and what and how we used this,” Maxey stated. “And being transparent approximately that. But at the back quit, we want the flexibility to percentage facts for regulation enforcement investigations.”

If the council receives to approve current equipment and facts gathered, it’s doubtful what form of backlog this may create. That is why the parameters specified in that ordinance will play a chief function.

The council is anticipated to vote on the new language subsequent month.

Sometimes lawmakers can’t face up to trolling Donald Trump. One Democrat is making an attempt to take a misspelled Trump tweet all of the manners to the House floor.

Rep. Mike Quigley (D-IL) added an invoice on Monday that might amend the Presidential Records Act to encompass Donald Trump’s non-public Twitter account. The invoice’s call? The “COVFEFE” Act.

The PRA — first enacted in 1978 following the Nixon management’s Watergate scandal — governs how facts of presidential communique are accumulated, archived, and made public. The bill’s full name is the “Communications Over Various Feeds Electronically for Engagement Act” and it might upload “social media” to the list of documentary substances preserved beneath the PRA and send Trump’s tweets to the National Archives. It might additionally make deleting tweets from this account a violation of the PRA situation to “disciplinary motion.”

The current language of the PRA does listing any shape of “electronic verbal exchange” as worthy of archiving, but Quigley’s bill makes a unique point out of “social media” in connection with the president’s non-public Twitter account. Something that is probably a long term coming, seeing as press secretary Sean Spicer said closing week that Trump’s tweets are all reputable White House statements. Despite the Trump administration’s insistence that his tweets aren’t well worth reporting approximately, it’s clear they have got emerge as a crucial a part of the president’s verbal exchange efforts.

As for the call, the acronym “coffee” is a tongue-in-cheek connection with the viral Trump tweet wherein the president misspelled the word “press insurance.” Trump has been the center of writing a late-night tweet complaining approximately his remedy via the media and apparently posted a typo. The mistake turned into straight away picked up and joked approximately all over the internet. The original tweet has because been deleted.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *